“Perpetual chemicals” are associated with high blood pressure, the study found

Millions of Americans have high blood pressure, which can lead to a heart attack or stroke if left untreated. In general, this condition is considered to be caused by nutrition. Now, however, an unfamiliar potential culprit has emerged: a synthetic chemical found in thousands of consumer goods, kitchenware, and even microwave oven popcorn bags, and can cause hypertension or high blood pressure.

These man-made “perpetual chemicals” – so called because of their ability to decompose – are known as PPAS-reduced per- and polyfluoroalkyls. They are used in everything from non-stick containers and fast food packaging to furniture and paper packaging. In fact, PFAS seems to enter our bloodstream in their most common part of industrial civilization.

A new report will appear here. According to a study on hypertension published in the Journal of the American Heart Association, middle-aged women had high blood pressure, and if they had high blood pressure, they had high levels of these chemicals in their blood.

CONNECTED: “Perpetual chemicals” in non-stick containers are now in your body – and can affect your liver

To determine this, the researchers used data from 1,000 women between the ages of 45 and 56. In all of them, blood pressure was normal and PFAS levels were measured before admission. Participants were racially diverse, from five cities in northern California or the United States, and identified as white (54.5%), Japanese (16.2%), black (15.2%), or Chinese (14.1%). involving women.

Their conclusion was that “women with high concentrations of specific PFAS may have a higher risk of developing high blood pressure,” more precisely, “women with a high concentration of one-third of all seven PFAS have a 71% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.”

Experts estimate that 99 percent of Americans have at least some PFAS in their blood. This means that in the study of such chemicals, attention must be paid to research degree Since it is almost impossible to have a control group with no impact. This poses some understandable challenges when attempting to establish a controlled experiment by assessing how PFAS affects human health.

Want more health and science news in your inbox? Subscribe to The Vulgar Scientist Salon’s weekly newsletter.

“We cannot know for sure that PFAS causes hypertension because our study is not an experiment comparing PFAS to exposing and unaffected governments,” said Sung Kyung Park, senior author of the study, Sc.D., MPH, associate professor. Epidemiology and Environmental Health Sciences of the University of Michigan School of Public Health reported to Salon via email. “To prove that environmental chemicals such as PFAS have a negative impact on health, we need a series of well-designed and well-conducted studies that show consistent results. and cardiovascular disease. ”

“At this point, the best way to reduce the impact on health is to focus on regulation so that we don’t have to deal with it in the first place and find ways to eliminate them completely from our environment.”

Liz Costello, a PhD student at the University of Southern California, who participated in a study linking PFAS to liver disease, praised the new report, noting that a personal observational study could not prove that PFAS causes hypertension. Studies like this are best without a controlled experiment, and they can confirm that there is no adverse cause for us (where high blood pressure can somehow affect blood PFAS levels) because the effects of PFAS preceded the development of hypertension. “

When asked if consumers could do anything to avoid PFAS, Costello was skeptical.

“I think it’s very difficult for people to avoid PFAS on their own,” Costello said. “There are some packaging filters, if you have contaminated water, there are filters that will remove them, but if you have PFAS in your food or household items, it’s a lot harder. Some products can be PFAS clean, so if you know what to look for However, there are thousands of PFAS and you can’t find most of them on product labels. “

He added, “The best way to reduce the impact on health at this time is to focus on regulation so that we don’t have to deal with it in the first place and find ways to eliminate them completely from our environment.”

Since this was unavoidable, people argued that emphasis should be placed on improving chemical regulations.

“It’s important that we regulate the PFAS by law,” Park said. “If we have stricter rules, everyone can benefit. It’s very important that our politicians do something and act on the impact of PFAS. We have a lot of scientific evidence that they consistently tell us that reducing PFAS is really important.”

For more Salon articles on pollution:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.