In February last year, she underwent a radical hysterectomy, which included a large selection of pelvic lymph nodes, part of the vagina, along with the removal of the uterus. His lymph nodes were clean. Such a radical operation meant that he did not need chemotherapy or radiotherapy. He is now free of cancer, is screened every three months, and has a 10-year chance of returning. Screening and surgery saved his life.
But it was the result of his lifelong treatment and the other perspective he acquired after becoming a “number” that led him to make a new documentary on the BBC, “Feeling Cancer with Anna Fry.” This is what Fry is full of footage taken on his phone during his cancer trip, and what makes this film so humane and able to question his survival rates and statistics on effective treatment.
“I cry for hours and hours. I also wrote a long diary, ”he said. He was a very personal person and at first “had to keep a diary and footage to write about how I felt at the time”.
He was persuaded to make a documentary by a friend who ran a television station: “He said: It’s also the story of a man who spent his whole life thinking about numbers and trying to rationalize things. ‘
This makes the documentary unique. Fry explained that he made the documentary because his fear of cancer was in stark contrast to his life as a mathematician who analyzed numbers and data without hindrance. In the documentary, he concludes: “The only number we think has a chance of dying … but we don’t honestly negotiate the benefits and costs of treatment, and only then can people decide what they want best.”
Documentary filmmakers have called his study “almost a medical ban.” The question is.
In the end, Fry chose radical surgery, he says, because after Guy went to the hospital, he was allowed only two options: first, removal of the cervix, and the uterus and lymph nodes remained intact. This allowed her and her husband to have the third child they wanted, but at the risk of spreading the cancer, as well as the risk of miscarriage due to cervical surgery. His life-threatening lymph nodes also grew. The second option was to remove everything to be safe.
“I didn’t push him,” he said by telephone. “I think it’s partly a pandemic and it’s a phone call and if you’re raised in the UK, I don’t want to be complacent and wasteful. [doctors’] team. I didn’t really want to ask more questions. It’s “we have a place to be on the table in three weeks. It’s a good slot. Do you want to?”
The accuracy of her lymph nodes meant that she could have survived without a hysterectomy. This treatment had two consequences: she lost the opportunity to have another child – “getting rid of it was part of my cancer” – and she developed lymphedema caused by the removal of the lymph nodes. . He was not ready for that. Today, her legs are swollen from dehydration, and she will have to wear mostly clothes, tights, or shorts for the rest of her life. How could he not know about it? Is the pandemic a general change in cancer care? Because he didn’t ask? Or is it unspoken?
“Last year was a time when I was just recovering from everything and recovering emotionally, and lymphedema was a real blow, a real blow. “I’m very angry about it,” he said.
“I don’t know if I would go back in time and make a different decision, but I want to feel more empowered or I really want to understand what risk is. My values and my level of risk have been taken into account. I don’t always think so. [with cancer care].
“I was so scared for my daughters and so scared I thought I would take a risk. I would pay whatever price I wanted.”