Editor-in-chief of leading scientific journal fired for publishing science questioning safety of COVID-19 vaccine

Dr. José Luis Domingo, who has been the editor-in-chief of the revered scientific journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT) for the previous seven years, stated he was primarily pressured to resign.

He stated his resignation was prompted by issues about scientific integrity and business affect in the case of scientific discussions in regards to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Although Domingo himself has obtained three vaccines (two from AstraZeneca and one from Pfizer), he instructed The Epoch Times that he has been subjected to insults, threats and accusations of being “anti-vaccine” since he allowed The Epoch Times to publish the analysis article. explores potential mechanisms of injury by injected artificial mRNA.

Although he needed to stay on the helm of the journal till the top of 2023, with a number of of his initiatives pending, Domingo resigned from the journal to protect his scientific independence.

He stated that he’s at the start a scientist and that he doesn’t remorse publishing the newspaper. Despite the assaults, he refused to offer in to strain from the journal’s writer.

The journal’s writer, Yagna Mirska, didn’t reply to our request for an interview.

However, Domingo stated the journal has already chosen a successor — somebody with clear connections to the pharmaceutical business: Brian Delaney, Ph.D.

According to his LinkedIn web page, Delaney is at the moment a toxicologist working at Heleon. Haleon is the brand new client well being model title of pharmaceutical big GlaxoSmithKlein.

GSK produces vaccines in opposition to hepatitis A and B, meningitis, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and human papillomavirus, amongst others. It additionally produces branded antibiotics and dozens of different pharmaceutical merchandise.

Toxicology Authority

Seventy-one-year-old Domingo is Distinguished Professor (Emeritus) of Toxicology and Environmental Health at Rovira i Virgili University in Spain.

In 2014 and once more in 2015, he was named a Highly Cited Researcher by the Institute for Scientific Information. As a acknowledged authority on toxicology, Domingo has served as Editor-in-Chief or Editor-in-Chief of greater than 11 scientific journals, together with Food and Chemical Toxicology, Environmental Studies, and Human and Environmental Risks. To assess.

As its web site explains: Food and Chemical Toxicology is “an internationally famend journal that publishes unique analysis articles and evaluations on the poisonous results of man-made or natural chemical substances occurring within the human setting in animals and people, significantly in meals, to medication, and chemical substances…”

The journal’s mandate is to “publish high-impact, scholarly work” and “function a multidisciplinary discussion board for toxicology analysis.”

Given its objective and the truth that thousands and thousands of folks have obtained injections that might defend them from COVID-19 infections, Domingo wrote an editorial expressing his concern in regards to the want for extra analysis on the safety of these vaccines.

He stated that Jagna Mirska, senior editor at Elsevier, which owns the journal, requested him to submit an editorial to research the toxicity (or lack thereof) of COVID-19 vaccines. So, in February 2022, there was an open name for submissions on Sunday.

A controversial paper

As a consequence, in June 2022, whereas Domingo was nonetheless at its head, the FCT revealed a novel and extremely technical doc: “Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs”.

The research was carried out by MIT Senior Research Scientist Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.; Dr. Peter McCullough, an internationally famend heart specialist who has revealed multiple hundred peer-reviewed articles in his 40-year profession; and Dr. Anthony Kyriakopoulos, a Greek medical microbiologist, MD and Ph.D. researcher. in medical and molecular microbiology.

Their analysis instructed that adjustments within the vaccine’s mRNA “might disguise the mRNA from mobile defenses and promote elevated organic half-life and better manufacturing of the spike protein.”

In doing so, these scientists imagine that mRNA vaccines could intervene with the physique’s pure immune response.

They described the interference as a “profound dysfunction,” which they imagine happens as a result of the protein interferes with a crucial mechanism of the innate immune response, referred to as the sort I interferon response. If they’re proper, the injected artificial mRNA might have a spread of damaging results on human well being, together with making our our bodies much less capable of management infections and suppress most cancers.

Additional due diligence as a result of delicate nature of the topic

“Since the start of the pandemic, most developed nations have acted with extraordinary pace to research a number of elements associated to SARS-Co-V-2 and COVID-19,” wrote Domingo, who stated he was its editor. He labored as journal supervisor for seven years and managing editor three years in the past.

“There are nonetheless a big quantity of gaps that have to be clarified … particularly relating to potential poisonous results … data revealed in scientific journals is admittedly very restricted,” he famous.

Domingo’s request for the vaccine safety papers additional acknowledged that “the aim of calling for analysis on the potential toxicological results of vaccines is to scale back skepticism about vaccination.”

The journal FCT revealed by Elsevier has a excessive influence issue on the Scientific Citation Index, which implies it’s a well-established and respected journal.

Domingo stated he took additional care within the evaluation course of as a result of he knew it was a “very delicate public and scientific subject.”

During customary peer evaluation, two or three exterior scientists with experience within the topic present a written opinion on whether or not or not the article must be revealed.

But on this case, Domingo invited at least 5 international reviewers. These reviewers appeared on the science with explicit care. They supplied detailed written suggestions and required three revisions from the authors.

After the third, all 5 had been accepted in presenting the paper.

Reaction, however not about science

A month after the newspaper was revealed, on Sunday, she began receiving offended emails and messages. Among them had been taunts, calls to resign, calls for to return the paper, and even threats.

In one e-mail, he requested her how she might sleep at evening realizing {that a} scientific paper she had approved to publish would kill thousands and thousands of folks.

The vitriolic messages, he stated, had been stuffed with advert hominem assaults in opposition to him and the paper’s authors, however didn’t categorical scientific objections to the article’s content material. Domingo welcomed the one scholarly response he obtained and instructed the authors that his journal could be prepared to publish a Letter to the Editor (LTE) from them if the LTE passes peer evaluation, which is customary course of for any revealed retraction. He despatched rebuttals to 4 reviewers, greater than traditional, as a result of delicate nature of the topic.

Two stated they failed the science take a look at. The two instructed that the authors evaluation it and resubmit. Based on this opinion, Domingo, he ought to have rejected the annulment altogether. Instead, he invited authors to evaluation and resubmit. But their evaluation was so “scientifically poor” that three out of 4 reviewers stated it shouldn’t be revealed. Given that he additionally discovered the rebuttal to be scientifically unfounded, he felt he had no alternative however to reject it, regardless of the writer’s “good strategies.”

Since then, pro-vaccine factions have stepped up their very own marketing campaign in opposition to it, going as far as so as to add false data to the Wikipedia entry about it, in addition to attacking the journal’s personal Wikipedia web page. Both, he says, have been misrepresented by anti-vaccination activists. Indeed, October. Version 4 of his web page, accessed via the Internet Archive, is titled “The Anti-Vaccine Controversy,” accusing Domingo of “spreading disinformation in the course of the pandemic.” That clause has since been eliminated.

A printed cancellation

On October 26, April 26, a name to retract and retract Seneff’s paper was revealed in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, one other scientific journal. In this name, a gaggle of 9 scientists from nations aside from France and Sweden argue that “Combating the unfold of disinformation requires monumental effort, and that requires little or no credit score, typically ending in intimidation.” .”

“The want for scientific integrity is on the coronary heart of our advocacy,” the researchers assert of their summary. They Seneff et. is she. the paper is named “lethal disinformation.”

The determination’s authors argue that the problem is “a matter of public well being, not a scientific debate,” and that they’ve made a “militant alternative” to hunt reversal.

They go on to say that the combat in opposition to scientific disinformation is “harmful, gradual and prone to be insufficient.”

They echoed the decision of the militants to withdraw from US President Joseph Biden’s assertion that “the one pandemic we’ve got is among the many unvaccinated; and they’re killing folks” (they emphasize italics) and say that this quote “is very true of individuals who encourage the religion of the unvaccinated”.

No citations accompany the competition that there’s at the moment a pandemic of the unvaccinated. This assertion just isn’t scientific. It can’t be cited as a result of it’s not true. Most latest research present that vaccines don’t forestall the unfold of COVID-19, and those that obtain the vaccine account for the bulk of deaths and hospitalizations from COVID-19.

mRNA injections aren’t protected, scientists say

“I’m proud to collaborate with an skilled group of researchers who’re dedicated to uncovering the poisonous results of SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs,” Jennifer Seneff, who revealed two Epoch Times articles, instructed us through e-mail. . “The similar group has written one other article that has been accepted for publication and can quickly seem in a peer-reviewed journal, and we’re engaged on a number of different articles which can be beneath evaluation or can be submitted quickly.

“We all imagine that mRNA vaccines are harming many individuals and that vaccine mandates are irresponsible and unwarranted,” he continued.

“It’s unfair that these attempting to grasp the science behind the toxicity of these vaccines face so many obstacles in our efforts to coach the general public in regards to the dangers they might face when receiving these injections. It can also be dishonest to exclude editors from the publishing world who attempt to publish articles that oppose narratives like ours.

Despite receiving three vaccines, Domingo contracted COVID-19 in July.

“The vaccines did not defend me sufficient,” he stated.

Since the start of 2022, we’ve got seen many scientists and medical doctors danger their careers, medical licenses, and even private safety to combat for scientific freedom and integrity.

comply with

Jennifer Margulies, Ph.D., is an award-winning journalist and creator of Your Baby, Your Path: Making Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Parenting Decisions for a Happy, Healthy Family. A Fulbright winner and mom of 4, she has labored on youngster survival campaigns in West Africa, advocated for an finish to youngster slavery in Pakistan on prime-time tv in France, and taught postcolonial literature to non-traditional college students within the nation’s inside departments. – City of Atlanta. Learn extra about it JenniferMargulis.web

Joe Wang

comply with

Joe Wang, Ph.D., is a molecular biologist with over 10 years of expertise within the vaccine area. He is now the president of New Tang Dynasty TV (Canada) and a columnist for the Epoch Times.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *